Consensus

← vista completa

Published on January 1, 2010 | http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2010.01.4295

Literature review for the use of mammography (Mx) in breast cancer screening

Revisión de la literatura para el uso de la mamografía (Mx) en tamizaje de cáncer de mama

Dravna Razmilic Valdés, María Elena Navarro Ortega, Lorena Cordero, Tatiana Muñoz, Dulia Ortega Torres

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Esta licencia permite el uso, distribución y reproducción del artículo en cualquier medio, siempre y cuando se otorgue el crédito correspondiente al autor del artículo y al medio en que se publica, en este caso, Medwave.

Authors

Dravna Razmilic Valdés

Sociedad Chilena de Mastología

María Elena Navarro Ortega

Sociedad Chilena de Mastología

Lorena Cordero

Sociedad Chilena de Mastología

Tatiana Muñoz

Sociedad Chilena de Mastología

Dulia Ortega Torres

Sociedad Chilena de Mastología

Figures

Article has no figures.

Forum

No messages

History

Citation Razmilic Valdés D, Navarro Ortega ME, Cordero L, Muñoz T, Ortega Torres D. Literature review for the use of mammography (Mx) in breast cancer screening. Medwave 2010;10(1):e4295 doi: 10.5867/medwave.2010.01.4295

Submission date 15/08/2009

Acceptance date 26/08/2009

Publication date 01/01/2010

Index

Metrics

Not available at the moment.

Notes

Keywords

mamografía, tamizaje, cáncer de mama

Origin and peer review

con revisión por pares externa

References

  1. Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future. J Med Screen. 2006;13(2):59-61. | CrossRef | PubMed
  2. Armstrong K, Moye E, Williams S, Berlin JA, Reynolds EE. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):516-26. | PubMed
  3. Beckett JR, Kotre CJ, Michaelson JS. Analysis of benefit:risk ratio and mortality reduction for the UK Breast Screening Programme. Br J Radiol. 2003 May;76(905):309-20. | CrossRef | PubMed
  4. Bjurstam N, Björneld L, Duffy SW, Smith TC, Cahlin E, Eriksson O, et al. The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization. Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11):2091-9. | CrossRef | PubMed
  5. Dershaw DD. Film or digital mammographic screening? N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1846-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  6. Duffy SW, Tabár L, Chen HH, Holmqvist M, Yen MF, Abdsalah S, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002 Aug 1;95(3):458-69. | CrossRef | PubMed
  7. Galit W, Green MS, Lital KB. Routine screening mammography in women older than 74 years: a review of the available data. Maturitas. 2007 Jun 20;57(2):109-19. Epub 2007 Mar 1. | CrossRef | PubMed
  8. Jackson VP. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines. Radiology. 2002 Nov;225(2):323-6. | CrossRef | PubMed
  9. Kopans DB. The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49. Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):4-9. | PubMed
  10. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document. Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):614-22. Epub 2007 Nov 17. | CrossRef | PubMed
  11. Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):376-83. | CrossRef | PubMed
  12. Roelofs AA, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N, Beck C, van Woudenberg S, Snoeren PR, et al. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):70-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  13. Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Qaqish BF, Barlow WE, Rosenberg RD, et al. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):681-9. | CrossRef | PubMed
  14. Schueller G, Riedl CC, Mallek R, Eibenberger K, Langenberger H, Kaindl E, et al. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Sep;67(3):487-96. Epub 2007 Sep 24. | CrossRef | PubMed
  15. Shaw CM, Flanagan FL, Fenlon HM, McNicholas MM. Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience. Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):354-62. | CrossRef | PubMed
  16. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JW, Rosenberg RD, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):775-90. | CrossRef | PubMed
  17. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, et al. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study. Radiology. 2005 Oct;237(1):37-44. Epub 2005 Aug 11. | CrossRef | PubMed
  18. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Jun;43(2):107-14. | CrossRef | PubMed
  19. Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K, Ernster VL, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, et al. Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):529-35. | CrossRef | PubMed
  20. Thurfjell EL, Lindgren JA. Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years. Radiology. 1996 Nov;201(2):421-6. | PubMed
  21. Tonita JM, Hillis JP, Lim CH. Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program. Radiology. 1999 May;211(2):529-33. | PubMed
  22. van den Biggelaar FJ, Nelemans PJ, Flobbe K. Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review. Breast. 2008 Feb;17(1):85-90. Epub 2007 Aug 30. | CrossRef | PubMed
  23. Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P. Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study. Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):183-91. Epub 2007 Aug 7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  24. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):347-58. | CrossRef | PubMed
  25. Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Qaqish BF, Barlow WE, Rosenberg RD, et al. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):681-9. | CrossRef | PubMed