← vista completa

Published on May 24, 2013 | http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2013.04.5668

Some biases and limitations present in biomedical literature: Part 2

Algunos sesgos y limitaciones de la información científica biomédica II

Miguel Araujo Alonso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Esta licencia permite el uso, distribución y reproducción del artículo en cualquier medio, siempre y cuando se otorgue el crédito correspondiente al autor del artículo y al medio en que se publica, en este caso, Medwave.

Authors

Miguel Araujo Alonso

Figures

Article has no figures.

Forum

No messages

History

Citation Araujo Alonso M. Some biases and limitations present in biomedical literature: Part 2. Medwave 2013;13(04):e5668 doi: 10.5867/medwave.2013.04.5668

Submission date 13/05/2013

Acceptance date 13/05/2013

Publication date 24/05/2013

Index

Metrics

Not available at the moment.

Notes

Origin and peer review

sin revisión por pares

References

  1. Sumathipala A, Siribaddana S, Patel V. Under-representation of developing countries in the research literature: ethical issues arising from a survey of five leading medical journals. BMC Med Ethics. 2004 Oct 4;5:E5. | CrossRef | PubMed
  2. Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1–90. | PubMed
  3. Marshall E. Antidepressants and children. Buried data can be hazardous to a company's health. Science. 2004 Jun 11;304(5677):1576-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  4. Stelfox HT, Chua G, O’Rourke K, Detsky AS. Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:101-106. | CrossRef | PubMed
  5. Barnes, Deborah E. MPH; Bero, Lisa A. PhD. Why Review Articles on the Health Effects of Passive Smoking Reach Different Conclusions. JAMA Volume 279(19) 20 May 1998 pp 1566-1570. | CrossRef | PubMed
  6. Bachelet VC. The importance of EQUATOR Network as a resource to promote good reporting of research studies. Medwave 2012 Nov;12(10):e5551 | CrossRef