Estudios originales
Published on 3 de septiembre de 2025 | http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.08.3081
Temporal analysis of the administration of encephalic reperfusion therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Chilean hospital: An analytical cross-sectional study
46.7% (n = 29) | 50% (n = 21) | 0.74 | |
66 ± 12.8 | 69.5 ± 13.2 | 0.17 | |
13.5 ± 6.8 | 13.5 ± 6 | 0.9 | |
51.6% (n = 32) | 45.2% (n = 19) | 0.5 | |
Thrombolysis 87% | Thrombolysis 97.6% | 0.14 | |
Thrombectomy 6.4% | Thrombectomy 2.3% | ||
Combined 6.4% | Combined 0% | ||
124.1 ± 102.7 | 98.3 ± 58.7 | 0.14 | |
24.3 ± 13.8 | 30.2 ± 20 | 0.08 | |
58.5 ± 30.4 | 68.4 ± 35.1 | 0.13 | |
173.4 ± 111.9 | 166.5 ± 67.3 | 0.71 |
MCA, Middle cerebral artery. ICA, Internal carotide artery. BA, Basilar artery. NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. CT , computed tomography.
1 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions. 2 95% confidence interval for the mean difference.
Results in proportions and averages ± standard deviation. Student’s t and Chi-square were used for the comparison of means and proportions, respectively.
Source: Prepared by the authors based on data from the study.