Conferencia

← vista completa

Publicado el 1 de julio de 2010 | http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2010.07.4618

Cesárea electiva y parto vaginal después de una cesárea: guías clínicas

Elective caesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical guidelines

Iván Rojas

Esta obra de Medwave está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 Unported. Esta licencia permite el uso, distribución y reproducción del artículo en cualquier medio, siempre y cuando se otorgue el crédito correspondiente al autor del artículo y al medio en que se publica, en este caso, Medwave.

Autores

Iván Rojas

Servicio de Obstetricia, Ginecología y Neonatología, Clínica Santa María, Santiago, Chile

Figures

Article has no figures.

Foro

No hay mensajes

Historial

Citación Rojas I. Elective caesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical guidelines. Medwave 2010;10(07):e4618 doi: 10.5867/medwave.2010.07.4618

Envío 01/01/1970

Aceptación 01/01/1970

Publicación 01/07/2010

Métricas

Vistas en HTML

150

Descargas en PDF

15

Total

165

% Descargas en PDF

10%

Ver detalle

Notas

Referencias

  1. McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA Jr, Olshan AF. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996;335(10):689-95. | CrossRef | PubMed
  2. Hibbard JU, Ismail MA, Wang Y, Te C, Karrison T, Ismail MA. Failed vaginal birth after a cesarean section: how risky is it? I. Maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(7):1365-71; discussion 1371-3. | CrossRef | PubMed
  3. Hemminki E, Meriläinen J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174(5):1569-74. | CrossRef | PubMed
  4. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93(3):332-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  5. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(5):1187-97. | CrossRef | PubMed
  6. Kaplan B, Royburt M, Peled Y, Hirsch M, Hod M, Ovadia Y, et al. Routine revision of uterine scar after prior cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73(6):473-5. | CrossRef | PubMed
  7. Shimonovitz S, Botosneano A, Hochner-Celnikier D. Successful first vaginal birth after Cesarean section: a predictor of reduced risk for uterine rupture in subsequent deliveries. Indian Med Assoc J 2000;2:526–8.
  8. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Fuelberth NJ, Fischermann E, Jones C, Hersh E. Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(5):709-12. | PubMed
  9. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181(4):882-6. | CrossRef | PubMed
  10. Goetzl L, Shipp TD, Cohen A, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Lieberman E. Oxytocin dose and the risk of uterine rupture in trial of labor after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(3):381-4. | CrossRef | PubMed
  11. Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183(5):1176-9. | CrossRef | PubMed
  12. Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43(3):475-88. | CrossRef | PubMed
  13. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345(1):3-8. | CrossRef | PubMed
  14. Delaney T, Young DC. Spontaneous versus induced labor after a previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102(1):39-44. | CrossRef | PubMed
  15. Phelan JP, Eglinton GS, Horenstein JM, Clark SL, Yeh S. Previous cesarean birth. Trial of labor in women with macrosomic infants. J Reprod Med 1984;29(1):36-40. | PubMed
  16. Flamm BL, Goings JR. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication? Obstet Gynecol 1989;74(5):694-7. | PubMed
  17. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185(4):903-5. | CrossRef | PubMed
  18. Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188(3):824-30. | CrossRef | PubMed
  19. Esposito MA, Menihan CA, Malee MP. Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study.Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(5):1180-3. | CrossRef | PubMed
  20. Shipp TD, Zelop CM, Repke JT, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97(2):175-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  21. Bujold E, Mehta SH, Bujold C, Gauthier RJ. Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187(5):1199-202. | CrossRef | PubMed