Revisión clínica

← vista completa

Publicado el 1 de enero de 2009 | http://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2009.01.3698

Versión cefálica externa: pasado, presente y perspectivas para el futuro

External cephalic version: past, present and future prospects

Víctor Hugo Araya Cárcamo, Joaquín Zambrano Freire

Esta obra de Medwave está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 Unported. Esta licencia permite el uso, distribución y reproducción del artículo en cualquier medio, siempre y cuando se otorgue el crédito correspondiente al autor del artículo y al medio en que se publica, en este caso, Medwave.

Autores

Víctor Hugo Araya Cárcamo

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile

Joaquín Zambrano Freire

Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta, Chile

Figures

Article has no figures.

Foro

No hay mensajes

Historial

Citación Araya Cárcamo VH, Zambrano Freire J. External cephalic version: past, present and future prospects. Medwave 2009;9(01):e3698 doi: 10.5867/medwave.2009.01.3698

Publicación 01/01/2009

Métricas del artículo

Artículo no tiene métricas.

Notas

Provenance and peer review

sin revisión por pares

Referencias

  1. Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, Williams MA, Daling JR. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: A large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Mar;166(3):851-2. | PubMed
  2. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000083. | PubMed
  3. Croughan-Minihane MS, Petitti DB, Gordis L, Golditch I. Morbidity among breech infants according to method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):821-5. | PubMed
  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologistis. Management of the breech presentation. ACOG technical bulletin Nº 95. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1986.
  5. Indications for cesarean section: Final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. CMAJ. 1986 Jun 15;134(12):1348-52. | PubMed
  6. Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: A safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jun;83(6):511-8. | PubMed
  7. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000 Oct 21;356(9239):1375-83. | CrossRef | PubMed
  8. Hogle KL, kilburn L, Hewson S, Gafni A, Wall R, Hannah ME. Impact of the international Term Breech Trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Jan;25(1):14-6. | PubMed
  9. Ferguson JE, Armstrong MA, Dyson DC. Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Nov;70(5):722-5. | PubMed
  10. Donald WL, Barton JJ. Ultrasonography and external cephalic version at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun;162(6):1542-5; discussion 1545-7. | PubMed
  11. Newman RB, Peacock BS, VanDorsten JP, Hunt HH. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 1):245-9; discussion 249-50. | PubMed
  12. Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Prediction of successful vaginal delivery in women undergoing external cephalic version at term for breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Sep 10;116(1):39-42. | CrossRef | PubMed
  13. Ben-Meir A, Erez Y, Sela HY, Shveiky D, Tsafrir A, Ezra Y. Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Sep;21(9):660-2. | CrossRef | PubMed
  14. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):630.e1-7; discussion e1-5. Epub 2008 May 23. | PubMed
  15. Wong MW, Lao TT, Liu KL. Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study. J Reprod Med. 2000 Mar;45(3):201-6. | PubMed
  16. Boucher M, Bujold E, Marquette GP, Veniza Y. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: A 14-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):751-4. | CrossRef | PubMed
  17. Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C. External cephalic version: Predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;94(5 Pt 1):783-6. | CrossRef | PubMed
  18. Chan LY, Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Prediction of successful vaginal delivery in women undergoing external cephalic version at term for breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Sep 10;116(1):39-42. | CrossRef | PubMed
  19. Lau TK, Lo KW, Wan D, Rogers MS. Predictors of succesful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jul;104(7):798-802. | CrossRef | PubMed
  20. Coltart T, Keith Edmond D, Al-Mufti R. External cephalic version at term: a survey of consultant obstetric practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):544-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  21. Indications for cesarean section: Final statement of the panel of the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth. CMAJ. 1986 Jun 15;134(12):1348-52. | PubMed
  22. Healey M, Porter R and Galimberti A. Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and a audit. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;104(9):1073-9. | CrossRef | PubMed
  23. Van Dorsten JP, Schiffrin BS, Wallace RL. Randomizedcontrol trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct 15;141(4):417-24. | PubMed
  24. Mauldin JG, Mauldin PD, Feng TI, Adams EK, Durkalski VL. Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Dec;175(6):1639-44. | CrossRef | PubMed
  25. Rosen DJD, Illeck JS, Greenspoon JS. Repeated external cephalic version at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;167(2):508-9. | PubMed
  26. Hanss JW Jr. The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun;162(6):1459-63; discussion 1463-4. | PubMed
  27. Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordström L, Svalenius E, Ranstam J. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Jan;92(1):19-22. | CrossRef | PubMed
  28. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000083. | PubMed
  29. Flamm BL, Fried MW, Lonky NM, Giles WS. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Aug;165(2):370-2. | PubMed
  30. Van Dorsten JP, Schiffrin BS, Wallace RL. Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct 15;141(4):417-24. | PubMed
  31. Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: A safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jun;83(6):511-8. | PubMed
  32. Hutton EK, Kaufman K, Hodnett E, Amankwah K, Hewson SA, McKay D, et al. External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks gestation versus 37 weeks gestation: a randomized multicenter trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):245-54. | CrossRef | PubMed
  33. Hofmeyr GJ. Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate: a controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 May;90(5):392-9. | CrossRef | PubMed
  34. Mahomed K, Seeras R, Coulson R. External cephalic version at term. A randomised controlled trial using tocolysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Jan;98(1):8-13. | PubMed
  35. Hofmeyr GJ, Sadan O, Myer IG, Galal KC, Simko G. External cephalic version and spontaneous version rates: ethnic and other determinants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jan;93(1):13-6. | CrossRef | PubMed
  36. Van Dorsten JP, Schifrin BS, Wallace RL. Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct 15;141(4):417-24. | PubMed
  37. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):946-50. | CrossRef | PubMed
  38. Hall MH, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet. 1999 Aug 28;354(9180):776. | CrossRef | PubMed
  39. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: casecontrol study. BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1089-93; discussion 1093-4. | CrossRef | PubMed
  40. Health Canada. Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System: Canadian perinatal health report, 2000. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, 2000.
  41. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA. 2000 May 10;283(18):2411-6. | CrossRef | PubMed
  42. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):946-50. | CrossRef | PubMed
  43. Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000166. | PubMed
  44. Cooper GM, Lewis G, Neilson J. Editorial: Confidential enquiries into maternal deaths, 1997-1999. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Sep;89(3):369-72. | PubMed
  45. LaSala AP, Berkeley As. Primary cesarean section and subsequent fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;157(2):379-83. | PubMed
  46. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R. Twickler DM. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;99(5 Pt 1):692-7. | CrossRef | PubMed
  47. Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):976-80. | CrossRef | PubMed
  48. LaSala AP, Berkeley As. Primary cesarean section and subsequent fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;157(2):379-83. | PubMed