Estudios originales

Prevalence and factors associated with cervical cancer preventive screening in a Peruvian region

Back to article
Crude and adjusted indicators of association between socio-sanitary factors and use of screening tests.
Preventive screeningCrude modelAdjusted model1
NoYesP valueRPc (95% CI)P valueRPa (95% CI)P value
Use of contraceptive methods
375 (55.0)307 (45.0)< 0.001Ref.Ref.
192 (41.4)272 (58.6)1.30 (1.16 to 1.45)< 0.0011.28 (1.16 to 1.41)< 0.001
Health insurance
68 (58.1)49 (41.9)0.048Ref.Ref.
499 (48.5)530 (51.5)1.23 (0.98 to 1.53)0.0671.31 (1.07 to 1.60)0.008
Received recommendation from healthcare personnel to undergo screening
286 (86.7)44 (13.3)< 0.001Ref.Ref.
281 (34.4)535 (65.6)4.91 (3.17 to 6.50)< 0.0014.80 (3.63 to 6.35)< 0.001
Do you have a gynecological disease?
524 (49.8)528 (50.2)0.45Ref.Ref.
43 (45.7)51 (54.3)1.08 (0.88 to 1.31)0.4341.05 (0.89 to 1.24)0.506
Do you have a family member/friend with cervical cancer?
467 (49.6)475 (50.4)0.886Ref.Ref.
100 (49.6)104 (51.0)1.01 (0.87 to 1.17)0.8851.01 (0.89 to 1.14)0.851
Worries about developing cervical cancer
231 (60.6)150 (39.4)< 0.001Ref.Ref
336 (43.9)429 (56.1)1.42 (1.23 to 1.63)< 0.0011.20 (1.06 to 1.36)0.003

95% CI, 95% confidence interval. CPR, crude prevalence ratio. aPR, adjusted prevalence ratio. Ref., reference variable.

Notes: 1Adjusted for all variables in the table.

Source: Own database from the study results.