Resúmenes Epistemonikos

Oral atenolol compared to oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma

Back to article
Atenolol compared to propranolol for infantile hemangioma.
Atenolol compared to propranolol for infantile hemangioma
PatientsPatients with infantile hemangioma
InterventionOral atenolol monotherapy
ControlOral propranolol monotherapy
OutcomesAbsolute effect*Relative effect (95% CI)Certainty of evidence (GRADE)
PropranololAtenolol
Difference: patients per 1000
Complete remission826 per 1000793 per 1000RR 0.96 (0.87 to 1.05)⊕⊕ΟΟI Low
Difference: 33 less(Margin of error: from 107 minus to 41 plus)
Decrease in Hemangioma Activity Score**The decrease in Hemangioma Activity Score was, on average, 0.08 standard deviations lower in the intervention group compared to the control.-⊕⊕ΟΟI Low
SMD: 0.08 less(Margin of error: from 0.29 less to 0.13 more)
Post-treatment relapse128 per 100077 per 1000RR 0.60 (0.32 to 1.13)⊕⊕ΟΟI Low
Difference: 51 less(Margin of error: 87 less to 17 more)
Adverse events☨662 per 1000550 per 1000RR 0.83 (0.46 to 1.51)⊕⊕ΟΟI Low
Difference: 112 less(Margin of error: 358 minus to 338 plus)
Severe adverse events☨☨23 per 100014 per 1000RR 0.61 (0.15 to 2.51)⊕⊕ΟΟI Low
Difference: 9 less(Margin of error: from 19 less to 34 more)
Margin of error: 95% confidence interval (95% CI).RR: Relative risk.SMD: Standardized mean difference.GRADE: Grades of evidence from the GRADE Working Group (see below).*The risks/averages with propranolol are based on the risks/averages of the control group in the studies. The risk/average with atenolol (and its margin of error) is calculated from the relative effect/mean difference (and its margin of error).** The Hemangioma Activity Score corresponds to a validated instrument, which is calculated as a score based on three subitems: deep swelling, color, and ulceration of the hemangioma. The calculated score can range from zero to eight points, and a change in one point is considered clinically relevant [25].☨ The outcome "adverse events" included gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, nausea), sleep disturbances, agitation, and/or cold extremities.☨☨ The outcome "severe adverse events" included the presence of bronchial hyperreactivity, hypotension, asymptomatic bradycardia, hypoglycemia, and/or hyperkalemia.I Two levels of certainty of evidence were downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision. The confidence interval limits in the outcomes are wide, favoring one therapy or another at each confidence interval limit.