Artículo de revisión

A systematic analysis of the literature on the post-COVID-19 condition in Latin America focusing on epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and risk of bias

Back to article
Risk of bias of included articles with a cross-sectional study design (n = 20).
AuthorJBI Critical Appraisal Checklist
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8
Angarita-Fonseca et al. 2023 [50]YYNNYYNY
Blümel et al. 2023 [51]YYYYYYYY
Braga et al. 2023 [52]YYYYYYYY
Busatto et al. 2022 [29]YYYYYYYY
Carrión-Nessi et al. 2023 [53]YYNYNNNY
Damiano, Rocca et al. 2023 [55]YYYYYYYY
Damiano, Caruso et al. 2022 [33]YYYYYYYY
Damiano, Neto et al. 2023 [54]YYYYYYYY
Gil et al. 2023 [57]YYYYYYYY
Henríquez-Beltrán et al. 2022 [40]YYYYYYYY
Izquierdo-Condoy et al. 2022 [39]YYNNYNNY
Labarca et al. 2021 [18]YYYYYYYY
Labarca et al. 2022 [40]YYYYYYYY
Lanz-Luces et al. 2022 [41]YYYYYYYY
Núñez-Cortés et al. 2021 [21]YYYYNNYY
Pérez-López et al. 2023 [59]YYYYYYYY
Prieto et al. 2021 [23]NNYYYYNY
Romero et al. 2023 [60]NYYYNNYY
Tajer et al. 2023 [61]YYNNYYNY
Varela-Tapia et al. 2022 [48]YYYYYYYY

Q1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?. Q2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?. Q3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?. Q4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?. Q5: Were confounding factors identified?. Q6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?. Q7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?. Q8: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?. Y: Yes. N: No. U: Unclear. N/A: Not applicable.